The Leverage: A small group can force national change if the math is undeniable. Town hall pressure. Primary challenges. Media amplification. Mathematical superiority. Congress faces a binary choice.

âš¡ Congressional Leverage: Binary Choice

A small group can force national change if the math is undeniable.

Power of the People - Congressional Leverage

Click to enlarge • Power of the People: 100M+ Constituents vs Corporate Average = 230:1 Advantage

The Four Pressure Points

1. Town Hall Pressure (Nader Rule)

1,500 signatures = mandatory town hall. We're targeting 10,000+ per district. Representatives forced to face constituents with petition data + survey stories.

This isn't optional. The Nader Rule forces them to show up and answer for their decisions.

2. Primary Challenge Threat (Jan 2026)

Any representative refusing telehealth faces immediate primary challenge.

Healthcare IS the dominant issue (80% of voters). Refusing solution = automatic vulnerability.

3. Media Amplification (55M Readers)

Pathos Communications + International Business Times - Ready to publish PHIERS story.

Publication happens when fundraising goal is reached. Your contribution directly funds the story that reaches 55M+ readers and changes the national conversation.

→ Fund the media campaign

4. Mathematical Inevitability

$1.95B per district constituent pressure vs. $8.5M corporate average.

230:1 advantage minimum.

Congress cannot ignore mathematical superiority.

🗳️ Congress's Binary Choice

✅ OPTION A: LEAD THIS

Say YES to telehealth in ACA by Jan 30.

Become heroes.

Save 22M people.

Trigger cascade.

Be remembered as problem-solvers.

❌ OPTION B: FACE REPLACEMENT

Refuse.

Face 100M+ organized constituents demanding removal.

Lose primary elections Jan 2026.

Be remembered as obstacles.

Congress will choose A. The pressure is mathematical. The choice is binary.

📊 The 3.5% Threshold

Guaranteed Change - 3.5% = 11.6M Signatures

Click to enlarge • 3.5% = 11.6M signatures = Guaranteed systemic change (Harvard research)

Harvard Research (Erica Chenoweth):

Studied 323 political campaigns from 1900-2006.

Finding: NO campaign where 3.5% of the population participated in sustained, organized action ever failed.

The math:

  • 3.5% of US population = 11.6M Americans
  • We're targeting 100M+ = 9x the threshold
  • Implication: Mathematically unstoppable

Systemic change isn't just possible—it's guaranteed once we reach and sustain 3.5% organized participation.

🎯 Vote Like Your Life Depends On It

Vote Like Your Life Depends On It

Click to enlarge • Because It Does – This Is About Healthcare, Jobs, and Survival

Ready to Build the Pressure?

Sign the petition. Build the leverage. Force Congress to choose.

✏️ Sign Petition Now 💪 See Buying Power → 📋 All Actions →